[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates
From: |
Vasilakes, Keith |
Subject: |
Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates |
Date: |
Wed, 16 May 2012 10:35:56 -0500 |
Because if I see 'calibrate' I think I'm expecting the osc freq to be fixed to
the design value.
So it should be calibrated to 8mhz because that's the frequency that the device
is supposed to run at.
Adjusting the frequency allows for making the osc freq something other than the
designed freq...
It's a small semantic issue I know.
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 10:32 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates
As Vasilakes, Keith wrote:
> OR, there could be 2 macros, one to calibrate the osc to 8 mhz and
> another to change it to 7.37
Why? Just calibrating it to whatever F_CPU has been set seems to
be a reasonably good idea to me.
Of course, any actual implementation might impose restrictions on
the possible F_CPU values it is willing to calibrate against.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [uracoli-devel] Baud rates, Vasilakes, Keith, 2012/05/15
- Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates, Daniel Thiele, 2012/05/15
- Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/05/15
- Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates, Vasilakes, Keith, 2012/05/15
- Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates, Axel Wachtler, 2012/05/16
- Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates, Vasilakes, Keith, 2012/05/16
- Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/05/16
- Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates,
Vasilakes, Keith <=
- Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/05/16
- Re: [uracoli-devel] Baud rates, Vasilakes, Keith, 2012/05/16