wesnoth-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Alternative Balancing


From: David White
Subject: Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Alternative Balancing
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 16:41:59 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)

James Spencer wrote:

Me being a total nag:
"
[quote="rogue"]
Should the Thunderguard also have a third swing then?[/quote]

At the risk of speaking for Dave, I would assume so.
"

Yeah, I've upgraded derivatives of the thunderer too now.

On the Assasin, and this is just my opinion (I'm happy that the
Northerners are getting defanged a bit however this works out). Yes,
the thing that makes these guys such a terror is the number of
attacks, not the damage they cause... With 3 attacks even a unit with
70% defence is pretty likely to come out of the altercation
poisoned... This certainly would defang the bugger...
Okay, I think I'll leave him at 17 gold, and go ahead and change his ranged attack from 3-3 to 4-2.

I'm a little more iffy on the Guardsman- That certainly would make him
a terror to deal with (maybe a bit too much so?).
Yes it would.....but only if he can get into position. 3 moves is a really big hindrance. We probably would have to make sure this unit doesn't get "quick" though, otherwise quick versions would be too powerful

oh, I have one other little nitpick, even with the guardsman at the
current 5-3 shouldn't the Dwarvish Stalwart go from 6-3 to 7-3 to
distribute the damage in his line a bit better?
Yes. Changed.

David




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]