classpath
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tests, Documentation


From: Patrik Reali
Subject: Re: Tests, Documentation
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 13:42:42 +0100

Hi Sascha,

I completely agree and support your wishes! In fact, it would be nice if the
whole classpath and its documentation (javadoc) would be rebuilt on a
regular base and offered through the website.

I disagree on one point: testing doesn't slow down development. It may be
boring, but it is like a safety net that prevents developers from comitting
buggy code and allow to detect errors early (and thus much faster) when they
are inserted.

-Patrik
--------
Patrik Reali
http://www.reali.ch/~patrik/
http://www.oberon.ethz.ch/jaos


> Dear co-hackers,
>
> having read quite a bit of Classpath code, I'd like to express two wishes.
>
> First, please write more test cases. I agree that it is boring, dumb, and
> taxing; testing slows down development. But it's also the most reliable
> way to make sure that code really works. If anyone needs to change our
> code in five years, they'll want to know whether their change has any
> serious impact. Without a large test suite, this is close to impossible.
>
> Second, please write understandable documentation for every single
> method. Developers should be able to create free programs without
> referring to external documents. These could disappear at any time.
>
> In other words, I think that we really need to improve the quality of our
> code. Building a sound foundation for others is not the same as some fun
> week-end hack.
>
> Thank you all,
>
> -- Sascha
>
> Sascha Brawer, address@hidden, http://www.dandelis.ch/people/brawer/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Classpath mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
>
>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]