Re: [Gnu-arch-users] archive storage format comments on the size

[Andrea Arcangeli]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:47:41AM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> 
>     > From: Andrea Arcangeli <address@hidden>
> 
>     > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:28:25AM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
>     > > If you have an idea to present, please make an effort to present it in
>     > > a manner that convinces me you have made an effort to express your
>     > > idea concisely and clearly, and made an effort to "get" how more
> 
>     > I think I already did. That was the email you answered to, that's why I
>     > found your complain ironic when posted to such an email.
> 
> Are you referring to this?:
> 
>     http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg02020.html

yes. Then this was the other part covering the benefits during network
transfer:

        http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg02023.html

I don't see what's wrong with that and I find ironic you complained to
these emails with the "don't send noise".

> in which you replied to an exchange about patch log management with a
> complete non-sequitor?

sequitor? either it's a typo or I don't know what it means and either
ways I can't deduce it from the context, sorry (wordnet and various
other online dicts didn't help either).

Andrea - If you prefer relying on open source software, check these links:
            rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.[45]/
            http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/