[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 01-as-require-shell-fn.patch

From: Bonzini
Subject: Re: 01-as-require-shell-fn.patch
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 07:53:46 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

> Public please.

Sorry, unintended.

> As I already said, if it ever happens that such a shell exists
> (supports LINENO but not shfn), then we lose one round.  Sounds
> useless a risk to take.

The attached patch tries to detect both no-shfn shell and

> Apply the same idea with an embedded M4sh script containing a simple
> and I'm happy.

I don't understand the need for another macro.  If it does not break
configure scripts (and that's why it's using a subshell), why not
putting the spy inside them too, so that it gets much more exposure?


Attachment: spy-functions-support.patch
Description: Text document

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]