[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_PROG_CC not working
From: |
Earnie Boyd |
Subject: |
Re: AC_PROG_CC not working |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:24:26 -0700 (PDT) |
--- Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> So I am back to something I raised some time ago: why the heck do we
> have to compile to recognize Mingw etc.? Can't we just uname? While
> anti-Autoconf (and btw, frankly, compiling __MINGW32__ makes no big
> difference to me), it seems better in that, for instance, it makes it
> possible to enable the support of these kind of machines without
> requiring a C compiler.
>
Speaking for MinGW authoritatively, there is no reason that uname can't be
used. I've supplied a uname for MinGW which config.guess uses correctly. I
also agree that requiring C isn't a good idea for autoconf.
Cheers,
=====
Earnie Boyd
mailto:address@hidden
--- <http://earniesystems.safeshopper.com> ---
--- Cygwin: POSIX on Windows <http://gw32.freeyellow.com/> ---
--- Minimalist GNU for Windows <http://www.mingw.org/> ---
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, (continued)
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Gary V. Vaughan, 2000/10/12
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Peter Eisentraut, 2000/10/11
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/11
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Peter Eisentraut, 2000/10/11
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/11
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/12
Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Earnie Boyd, 2000/10/11
Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Earnie Boyd, 2000/10/11
Re: AC_PROG_CC not working,
Earnie Boyd <=
RE: AC_PROG_CC not working, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/10/27
RE: AC_PROG_CC not working, Earnie Boyd, 2000/10/27