[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_PROG_CC not working
From: |
Peter Eisentraut |
Subject: |
Re: AC_PROG_CC not working |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 22:13:03 +0200 (CEST) |
Morten Eriksen writes:
> (So, in the Cygwin case it doesn't really matter whether you set the
> executable suffix to ".exe" or "", I guess.)
This equivalency only affects stat() and the PATH search of the shell. So
you can write makefiles like this:
fooprog: $(OBJS)
$(CC) -o $@ $^
install: fooprog
$(INSTALL) fooprog$(EXEEXT) $(bindir)
and they will work. But it probably doesn't in general on other systems
that have executable extensions. In fact, I'd have no idea how to act in
face of arbitrary $(EXEEXT) values.
--
Peter Eisentraut address@hidden http://yi.org/peter-e/
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, (continued)
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Bob Friesenhahn, 2000/10/10
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/10
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Gary V. Vaughan, 2000/10/10
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/11
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Gary V. Vaughan, 2000/10/12
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Peter Eisentraut, 2000/10/11
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/11
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/11
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working,
Peter Eisentraut <=
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/11
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Morten Eriksen, 2000/10/12
Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Earnie Boyd, 2000/10/11
Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Earnie Boyd, 2000/10/11
Re: AC_PROG_CC not working, Earnie Boyd, 2000/10/27
RE: AC_PROG_CC not working, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/10/27
RE: AC_PROG_CC not working, Earnie Boyd, 2000/10/27