[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Forbidden strings
|
From: |
Akim Demaille |
|
Subject: |
Re: Forbidden strings |
|
Date: |
06 Nov 2000 10:59:40 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
>>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> writes:
Pavel> Autoconf could also check configure with "sh -n" - it may be
Pavel> more effective than scanning for macros, although some
Pavel> constructs will not be caught.
No really, `sh -n' is way too weak, it can only catch very obvious
mistakes.
- Re: Forbidden strings, (continued)
- RE: Forbidden strings, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/11/03
- RE: Forbidden strings, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/11/03
- RE: Forbidden strings, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/11/03
- RE: Forbidden strings, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/11/06
- Re: Forbidden strings, Earnie Boyd, 2000/11/06
- Re: Forbidden strings, Earnie Boyd, 2000/11/07