[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the t
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite) |
Date: |
30 Nov 2000 14:50:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
>>>>> "Daniele" == Daniele Arena <address@hidden> writes:
Daniele> Ehm... Sorry, but now there's something I don't
Daniele> get. Really. Is it in any way possible that the tests give
Daniele> different results if run with different shells?...
Sure! That would reveal bugs in Autotest. But it should not show
anything related to Autoconf per se.
Daniele> I ran the same commands on the same sources (but 2 separate
Daniele> directories) to make check the package, but in one I used
Daniele> tcsh to issue the commands and in the other I used bash. And
Daniele> I have different results, i.e. different sets of failures.
Just don't use any C shell for any Auto* stuff. And do yourself a
favor: don't use any C shell at all :)
Daniele> Up to now, I thought that the shell from which I run the
Daniele> commands had no importance whatsoever. Was I wrong?
It depends how you run the test suite. I mean, it should use /bin/sh
in any case but if you
tcsh ./testsuite
but if you `make check', or `./testsuite', it should be /bin/sh.
Daniele> If you need all the output files, tell me. I just didn't want
Daniele> to flood the list with them. I can also try other shells if
Daniele> you like:-}.
I don't think you really ran tcsh. There are way too many differences
for it to proceed. But after all, why not make sure it is not a C
shell?
How about this:
if (foo=foo; test "$foo" != foo) >/dev/null 2>&1; then
AC_MSG_ERROR([your shell does not appear to be a Bourne shell])
fi
- Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Akim Demaille, 2000/11/29
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Daniele Arena, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Daniele Arena, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Daniele Arena, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite),
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Daniele Arena, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Daniele Arena, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Daniele Arena, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Daniele Arena, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Daniele Arena, 2000/11/30
- Re: Backquotes in quotes in backquotes (Was: Success (mostly) with the testsuite), Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30