[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch)
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:19:19 -0600 (MDT) |
Thanks for noticing the problem.
+The @file{INSTALL} file is free documentation; the Free Software
+Foundation gives unlimited permission to copy, distribute and modify it.
There are two possibilities. If the file is big enough, it should use
the GFDL. Otherwise, what you have in mind is basically right, but
this isn't the right way to word it. How big is the file?
- copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch), Paul Eggert, 2001/08/12
- Re: copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch), Paul Eggert, 2001/08/13
- Re: copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch), Richard Stallman, 2001/08/14
- Re: copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch), Paul Eggert, 2001/08/14
- Re: copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch), Richard Stallman, 2001/08/15
- Re: copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch), Paul Eggert, 2001/08/15
- Re: copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch), Richard Stallman, 2001/08/16
- Re: copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch), Paul Eggert, 2001/08/16
- Re: copyright notice on the 'INSTALL' file (proposed autoconf patch), Richard Stallman, 2001/08/17
- 'make-stds.texi' copyright notice (needed for autoconf, make), Paul Eggert, 2001/08/14
- Re: 'make-stds.texi' copyright notice (needed for autoconf, make), Paul D. Smith, 2001/08/15