[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "make dist" calls "autoheader" ? duh...
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: "make dist" calls "autoheader" ? duh... |
Date: |
19 Jul 2001 14:48:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>> "gd" == Guido Draheim <address@hidden> writes:
gd> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>>
>> Actually, the first build after each run of aclocal will trigger
>> this (in your story that would be `make', not `make dist', so
>> maybe I'm commenting something else :)).
>>
gd> sadly, you do :))
gd> auto:
gd> aclocal && autoconf && autoheader && automake
gd> cross-make.sh auto
gd> configure && make && make dist AUTOHEADER=false
gd> ... booom!!
I'm still not convinced we are not speaking about the same thing.
Doesn't
| cross-make.sh auto
| configure && make AUTOHEADER=false
fail too? I believe it should.
However, I think that
| cross-make.sh auto
| cross-make.sh
| configure && make && make dist AUTOHEADER=false
should work, because the second cross-make.sh will update the
stamp files.
gd> (as a side-note, you know that cross-make.sh from libsdl.org, and
gd> I just configure newstuff autotools to end up in local/cross-tools)
Looks like a rather strange decision to me.
(BTW, regarding cross-compilation, why do you need cross-make.sh
at all? It adds /usr/local/cross-tools/i386-mingw32msvc/bin to
the PATH which I found an evil thing to do for a maintainer: an
autoconfiscated project ought to be able to cross-compile
without changing the PATH.)
[...]
gd> but now I'm going to see a bit of the sun out there,
*sun*? Were in Germany do you live to have sun? :) That's quite
rare in France these days. (Moreover my umbrella is broken. It
always rains when your umbrella has a release critical bug.)
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz