Re: Forcing static link of libstdc++

[Mike Melanson]

Stefan Puiu wrote:
> I also think Ralf's suggestion about parallel versions for
> libstdc++.so.5 and libstdc++.so.6 is the best; it's fairly easy to
> have two versions of gcc installed on the Linux build machine, and
> then use something like g++-3.3 for libstdc++.so.5 and g++-4.0 (or
> 3.4) for version 6. That sounds a *LOT* easier than all the hacks you
> mention in your blog.

At least 2 problems:

1) Having 2 binaries would immediately double the QA effort.
2) So far, there is only one version of gcc that can compile the Flash 
Player and it is tied to libstdc++ v6.

--
        -Mike Melanson