[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:06:29 -0500 |
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 13:17 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Ralf Hemmecke <address@hidden> writes:
> > Sure. But it is also relevant if one developer adds a macro which is
> > only available in some recent version of automake, say. Another
> > developer might not yet have that automake version.
>
> It doesn't really seem any worse than _any_ potential tool
> incompatibility problem -- compiler version, library version, etc --
> though...
Exactly. Actually finding these kinds of errors during development is a
benefit, IMO, as it increases portability.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.net
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
- Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools, (continued)
Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/19
- Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools, Ralf Hemmecke, 2011/02/22
- Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools, Paul Smith, 2011/02/22
- Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools, Ralf Hemmecke, 2011/02/22
- Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools, Miles Bader, 2011/02/22
- Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/23
- Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools, Ralf Hemmecke, 2011/02/23
- Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools, Miles Bader, 2011/02/24
Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools,
Paul Smith <=
Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/23
Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools, Ralf Hemmecke, 2011/02/22
Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools, Eric Blake, 2011/02/21
Re: debbugs, and a FAQ, for Autotools, Ben Pfaff, 2011/02/23