[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pre-built binary package
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: Pre-built binary package |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:11:53 -0500 (CDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14) |
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Linux is not a platform that easily accomodates installable binary blobs.
While you provided lots of good advice, in my experience it is
possible to provide binaries which do run on most x86 GNU/Linux
systems. Typically such binaries are built on a somewhat older
("stable") systems and don't depend on many OS-provided shared
libraries.
It is of course necessary to test on common systems to make sure that
the binaries do indeed work.
If an AMD64 Linux distribution does not provide 32-bit libraries by
default, they can still usually be installed by the user using the
normal package manager.
My experience is primarily as a user of such binaries.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
- Re: Pre-built binary package, (continued)
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Too, Justin A., 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Diego Elio Pettenò, 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Eric Blake, 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Nick Bowler, 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Sam Varshavchik, 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Dan Kegel, 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Too, Justin A., 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2012/09/24
- Re: Pre-built binary package,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
Re: Pre-built binary package, Too, Justin A., 2012/09/20