[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pre-built binary package
From: |
Baurzhan Ismagulov |
Subject: |
Re: Pre-built binary package |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:12:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:03:11PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> There's a lot of naysaying going on here, but don't assume that a single
> properly built binary can't be made to run on a large number of systems
> until you've looked into it carefully. All you have to do is target the
> lowest common denominator, and statically link anything that isn't
> compatible with all the target systems.
He already said that he isn't looking for one-size-fits-all solution.
Providing different builds for every supported distro version may be
cheaper than carefully looking into the single binary solution. But he
also needs location independence. This could be solved by single binary
or dlopen. Justin, just out of curiosity: Why do you want location
independence?
With kind regards,
Baurzhan.
- Pre-built binary package, Too, Justin A., 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Too, Justin A., 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Diego Elio Pettenò, 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Eric Blake, 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Nick Bowler, 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Sam Varshavchik, 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Dan Kegel, 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package,
Baurzhan Ismagulov <=
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Too, Justin A., 2012/09/20
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2012/09/24
- Re: Pre-built binary package, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/09/20