Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: 404 http://axiom.tenkan.org/axiom.20040321.tgz]

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings!

Along these lines, I'd just like to note that the 01/30 axiom snapshot
has just entered Debian testing.  Had to hand compile on alpha to get
around a libc6.1 bug which apparently will not be fixed soon.

As earlier stated, I'd like to get another snapshot in before the
Debian 'sarge' release is finalized.  Toward this end, I think the
axiom package needs splitting, at the very least due to the Debian
policy requirements that arch-dependent (e.g. .o files) and
arch-independent (e.g. source files and docs) data needs to be
separated.

As I know there are quite a few Debian axiom users here, I thought I'd
solicit opinions on a binary package structure.  Perhaps at least
axiom, axiom-doc and  axiom-source.

Take care,

David MENTRE <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello Camm,
> 
> Camm Maguire <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > 6) I'd like to include the output of dvipdfm on the book.dvi.  I'm
> >    also wondering if the documentation can be readily converted into
> >    info and/or html format by existing tools.
> 
> noweb is capable of producing html output, using -html switch. However,
> I don't know how to handle graphics. Probably more simple to convert the
> raw .tex file into html using Hevea or latex2html.
> 
> Yours,
> d.
> -- 
> David MENTRE <address@hidden> -- http://www.nongnu.org/axiom/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Axiom-developer mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah