[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex
From: |
C Y |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:35:04 -0700 (PDT) |
--- Stephen Wilson <address@hidden> wrote:
> Cliff, *,
>
> Just for the record, I delved into the pamphlet-as-latex thing head
> first and implemented my own noweb-like tool because I wanted to
> enrich my understanding of the issues.
That's always an excellent reason :-).
> The timing was motivated by
> the steadfast insistence by Martin and Ralf that they did not want to
> see the latex change migrate into trunk. I do not want to see either
> of them leave, as I greatly value their insights and work. However,
> that is not enough (for me) to say that the latex change should not
> occur.
Correct. If possible, objective evaluation criteria should be found.
> I eventually came to what I hope is technical, objective, position as
> to why pamphlets-as-latex is not the correct approach. At the same
> time I am trying to advocate a perspective about what pamphlets _can_
> become which is consistent (I hope) with Tim's vision.
I hope I have understood your arguments, and if I have I agree - the
weave step and typing of chunks is sufficiently advantageous that it is
worth maintaining the separation.
> I sincerely hope that others will chime in and back the approach I am
> advocating, or perhaps something simillar. I have yet to see what is
> lost by adopting it.
I second that hope - so far it's just been a couple of players. How
about it, y'all?
(Steve, I do plan to go over your code in more detail, once I get time
- work has been very time consuming the last few days and that has
slowed me down :-(. )
Cheers,
CY
____________________________________________________________________________________
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news,
photos & more.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, C Y, 2007/07/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, C Y, 2007/07/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, C Y, 2007/07/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, C Y, 2007/07/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, C Y, 2007/07/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex,
C Y <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/18
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/07/19
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, C Y, 2007/07/19
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/07/19
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, C Y, 2007/07/19
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/19
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Andrey G. Grozin, 2007/07/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/18
[Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/17
[Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/17