Re: glr.c cleanup

[Hans Aberg]

On 8 Dec 2005, at 02:11, Joel E. Denny wrote:

> > The "p" might be convenient if both variables are to be used side  
> > by side. However, also consider the multilingual issue: it won't  
> > be needed under C++.
>
> Because it will always be a pointer?  Or because it will always be  
> an object?

Under C++, I think one should have:

namespace yy {

   class stack;
   ...
}


> > So in order to keep multilingual similarity, that suggests just  
> > naming it "yystack", without a "p". Names with a "p" added should  
> > then be reserved for C implementation variables, but not in the  
> > interface.
>
> I don't believe yystack is part of the interface.

Under C++, one would be able to choose stack, with at least two  
standard choices: std::vector, and std::deque.

  Hans Aberg