Re: %type {...} a b c

[Akim Demaille]

>>> "Joel" == Joel E Denny <address@hidden> writes:

 > I like the idea of equating a semantic type with a type in the
 > target language rather than with a union field name.  I also see
 > how modules might conflict on a field name, but types don't have
 > that problem.

It also solves one of the issues to support C++ variants in bison,
where we do not rely on a union, but on a templated structure,
parametrized by the various types.  That's *if* we use Boost Variants.