[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: %type {...} a b c
|
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
|
Subject: |
Re: %type {...} a b c |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:18:48 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 12 Jul 2006, at 22:14, Joel E. Denny wrote:
>
> > I like the idea of making the union an implementation detail
> > that the user doesn't have to think much about (POD issues aside).
>
> As a default, I guess you mean.
Yes.
Joel
- Re: glr: include the created header, Akim Demaille, 2006/07/05
- Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/07/05
- %merge <foo> -> %merge foo ?, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/12
- Re: %merge <foo> -> %merge foo ?, Joel E. Denny, 2006/07/12
- Re: %merge <foo> -> %merge foo ?, Joel E. Denny, 2006/07/12
- Re: %merge <foo> -> %merge foo ?, Akim Demaille, 2006/07/13
- Re: %merge <foo> -> %merge foo ?, Akim Demaille, 2006/07/13
- Re: %type {...} a b c, Akim Demaille, 2006/07/13
- (no subject), haberg, 2006/07/13