Re: %type {...} a b c

bison-patches

On 12 Jul 2006, at 22:14, Joel E. Denny wrote:

I like the idea of making the union an implementation detail
that the user doesn't have to think much about (POD issues aside).

As a default, I guess you mean. It will not work in a more general C++ setting.


  Hans Aberg

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: glr: include the created header, Akim Demaille, 2006/07/05
- Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/07/05
  - Re: glr: include the created header, Akim Demaille, 2006/07/12
    - Re: glr: include the created header, Joel E. Denny, 2006/07/12
  - Re: returning a symbol, Akim Demaille, 2006/07/12
    - Re: returning a symbol, Joel E. Denny, 2006/07/12
  - Re: %type {...} a b c, Akim Demaille, 2006/07/12
    - Re: %type {...} a b c, Joel E. Denny, 2006/07/12
    - Re: %type {...} a b c, Hans Aberg <=
    - Re: %type {...} a b c, Joel E. Denny, 2006/07/12
    - (no subject), haberg, 2006/07/13
    - %merge <foo> -> %merge foo ?, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/12
    - Re: %merge <foo> -> %merge foo ?, Joel E. Denny, 2006/07/12
    - Re: %merge <foo> -> %merge foo ?, Joel E. Denny, 2006/07/12
    - Re: %merge <foo> -> %merge foo ?, Akim Demaille, 2006/07/13
    - Re: %merge <foo> -> %merge foo ?, Akim Demaille, 2006/07/13
    - Re: %type {...} a b c, Akim Demaille, 2006/07/13
    - (no subject), haberg, 2006/07/13