[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] -D, --define.
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] -D, --define. |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:15:58 -0500 (EST) |
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > That makes sense to me. In the eyes of the user, Bison-specified or
> > skeleton-specified default values fall in the generated portion of
> > parser.tab.c just like any other code from Bison or from a skeleton.
> >
> > Perhaps the syncline macro could detect this case by looking for a
> > negative line number.
>
> Makes sense to me. Now we'll see who draws first :)
I won't draw any time soon, so feel free.
- [PATCH] -D, --define., Akim Demaille, 2008/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] -D, --define., Joel E. Denny, 2008/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] -D, --define., Akim Demaille, 2008/11/10
- Re: [PATCH] -D, --define., Akim Demaille, 2008/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] -D, --define., Joel E. Denny, 2008/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] -D, --define., Akim Demaille, 2008/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] -D, --define.,
Joel E. Denny <=