[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:37:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22) |
BTW, it might be prudent to document that Autotest needs fds 6 and 7.
While AT_CHECK commands are run in a subshell, other commands in the
testsuite aren't, and the fact that the job fds are open in the test
group code can easily break both the job handling and the test group
code. Or we bite the bullet and use another subshell to actually be
able to close the fds for the test group code. :-/
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, (continued)
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- [PATCH] Avoid passing autotest job fds to test groups., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/21
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid passing autotest job fds to test groups., Eric Blake, 2010/07/21
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid passing autotest job fds to test groups., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/21
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid passing autotest job fds to test groups., Eric Blake, 2010/07/21
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid passing autotest job fds to test groups., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/21
- [PATCH] Plug race in parallel autotest., Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20