[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: asking for a better way to implement this
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: asking for a better way to implement this |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:46:15 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:39:56PM +0200, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote:
> > It's a bad idea to alias rm. It would be better to use your xrm
> > directly. If you alias rm and get in the habit of it protecting you,
> > one of these days the alias won't be there and OOPS, gone!
>
> Well... I know what you mean, but I'm using GNU/Linux for seven years now,
> it's now
> almost impossible to learn to use `xrm' instead of `rm'. Besides, it won't
> disappear
> somewhen, it's hardcoded (and bound to other stuff, which I know whether it
> exists or
> not).
You might reinstall your OS one day, either due to hardware failure or
simply upgrading. Then you might forget to build the rm alias.
Or you might get a job working on Unix systems. The systems at work will
not have your rm alias.
Or you might be on a friend's computer.... You get the idea, I hope.
- asking for a better way to implement this, Christopher Roy Bratusek, 2010/09/26
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Ken Irving, 2010/09/26
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Dennis Williamson, 2010/09/26
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Christopher Roy Bratusek, 2010/09/27
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this,
Greg Wooledge <=
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Chris F.A. Johnson, 2010/09/27
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Christopher Roy Bratusek, 2010/09/27
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Andre Majorel, 2010/09/27
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Andreas Schwab, 2010/09/28
Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Andreas Schwab, 2010/09/26