|
From: | Sam Liddicott |
Subject: | Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading |
Date: | Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:18:03 -0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17pre) Gecko/20110322 Lanikai/3.1.10pre |
On 23/03/11 20:32, Maarten Billemont wrote:
On 23 Mar 2011, at 21:28, Chet Ramey wrote:OK. What wording would you like to see?I don't mind the wording he proposed: On 23 Mar 2011, at 17:12, Sam Liddicott wrote:maybe it should say BASH_SUBSHELL Incremented by one in each nested subshell or subshell evironment. It is always 0 when $BASH_PID=$$
Yup, that's what I would like to see. Sam
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |