[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Prefer non-gender specific pronouns

From: Lawrence Velázquez
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prefer non-gender specific pronouns
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 13:16:21 -0400
User-agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-519-g27a961944e-fm-20210531.001-g27a96194

On Sun, Jun 6, 2021, at 12:35 AM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2021-06-05T23:29:58-0400, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> >     doc/oldbash.texi
> >     178:manual.  Brian and Diane would like to thank Chet Ramey for his
> >     9138:# The alternative explanation is that his frequent use of the
> My "git grep" didn't turn this file up anyway.  Maybe I'm on the wrong
> branch?

I'm on the "devel" branch.

> > That's three.  Pretty tractable for anyone so inclined.  (Didn't
> > look at source code comments or anything.)
> Thanks, Lawrence!

Sorry, you might want to redo your patch.  It just occurred to me
that I made a predictable oversight.

        % git grep --perl-regexp '\b(she|her|hers)\b' -- '*.texi'
        doc/oldbash.texi:# If the user has her own init file, then use that 
one, else use
        doc/oldbash.texi:and the second draft.  Without her help, this manual 
would probably
        lib/readline/doc/rltech.texi:possible-completions call.  After that, 
readline asks the user if she is sure
        lib/readline/doc/rltech.texi:she wants to see them all.  The default 
value is 100.  A negative value 

(I believe doc/oldbash.texi is a legacy document that needn't be
bothered with.)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]