bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binari


From: chris at seberino dot org
Subject: [Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries
Date: 17 Dec 2009 16:33:32 -0000

------- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org  2009-12-17 16:33 
-------
Subject: Re:  Bug in objdump when disassembling raw
        armv4t binaries

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:01:02AM -0000, nickc at redhat dot com wrote:
> Don't mind me, I was just whining...

I understand.  This is a little tedious.  I commend you for hanging on this
far.  It does take a lot of work on your part to fix other peoples' code.  It
is a big responsibility since so many people use binutils.  You are doing a lot
of hard work.  There is no denying that.  Anything I can do to motivate you to
hang on?

> > Did you catch all the load and store situations that are UNPREDICTABLE
> > when the same register is used twice I alerted you to in a previous email?
>
> I think so.  Please try updating your sources in order to get my latest patch
> and then see if you still find any undetected unpredictable instructions.

I assume if I wait until Friday that it will have the patch included already?

> (Actually I know that we are not currently detecting many unpredictable THUMB
> instructions, but I was going to look at them after we are confident that we
> have the ARM instruction set covered).

Yes me too.  I'll attack Thumb after ARM (32 bit) is all done.  I'm hoping the
loads and stores are the hardest part.   We should be almost done with that.
Hopefully things will go a lot faster now.  *knocking on wood*

cs


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10924

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]