[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du)

From: Alfred M. Szmidt
Subject: Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du)
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:18:14 +0100

   Here we go. again.

You wanted it included, not me.  I'm just telling you what you should
do to make Jim happy. =)

Some more nitpicks, I don't think this option deserves an short
option.  And maybe you could make the long option take an argument?
I.e. something like --broader-size=12, this way you won't hit a
"limit", and you give the user freedom to pick her own preference.
Also, the option name sucks, it should be something more descriptive,
maybe --size-width?

One more thing, the man pages get generated from the --help output,
you should document this option in the .texi manual that is located
somewhere in the source tree.

And finally, I hate base64 encoded patches, but that is just me.  If
one inlines them then one can easily comment on details or whatever,
this is impossible with base64 encoded patches.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]