[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du)

From: Matthias Schniedermeyer
Subject: Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du)
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:30:15 +0100 (CET)


> You wanted it included, not me.  I'm just telling you what you should
> do to make Jim happy. =)

I don't WANT it to be included. It was a suggestion, nothing more, nothing

> Some more nitpicks, I don't think this option deserves an short
> option.


>  And maybe you could make the long option take an argument? I.e.
> something like --broader-size=12, this way you won't hit a "limit", and
> you give the user freedom to pick her own preference. Also, the option
> name sucks, it should be something more descriptive, maybe --size-width?

Let's wait until someone implements.

--output-format='%f %s[..]'
(See "find" for all the options that should be there)

Bis denn

Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated,
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]