[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Oct 2020 17:23:35 +0200 |
> E= -> €
>
> Typewriter-style italian characters.
If they really are typewriter-style, wouldn't C= make more sense? E overstruck
with = would just be a smudgy mess even if typed on a beautiful Olivetti.
Both C= and E= seem to work as X11 compose pairs. We could include both.
That is, c=, C=, e=, E=, and c==, C==, e==, E== as the literal cases.
- bug#44155: Print integers as characters, (continued)
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Richard Stallman, 2020/10/14
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Richard Stallman, 2020/10/14
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Juri Linkov, 2020/10/14
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Robert Pluim, 2020/10/14
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Richard Stallman, 2020/10/14
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/14
bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions,
Mattias Engdegård <=
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Robert Pluim, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Francesco Potortì, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Robert Pluim, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Francesco Potortì, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Francesco Potortì, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/10/09