[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Oct 2020 19:18:20 +0200 |
>>>>> On Thu, 08 Oct 2020 18:10:34 +0200, Francesco Potortì <pot@gnu.org> said:
>> Both C= and E= seem to work as X11 compose pairs. We could include both.
>> That is, c=, C=, e=, E=, and c==, C==, e==, E== as the literal cases.
Francesco> I would not include c= and C=. I would not include e= either.
These
Francesco> things are very annoying unless they are really useful, so
better just
Francesco> include what's really needed and nothing more.
The advantage of e= is that (on a US-type keyboard at least) it
doesnʼt involve any modifiers. But then again adding it would increase
the chances of someone typing it by mistake.
Robert
--
bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Robert Pluim, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Francesco Potortì, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions,
Robert Pluim <=
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Francesco Potortì, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Francesco Potortì, 2020/10/08
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Robert Pluim, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Robert Pluim, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/09