bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions

[Mattias Engdegård]

8 okt. 2020 kl. 19.18 skrev Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>:

>    Francesco> I would not include c= and C=.  I would not include e= either.  
> These
>    Francesco> things are very annoying unless they are really useful, so 
> better just
>    Francesco> include what's really needed and nothing more.
> 
> The advantage of e= is that (on a US-type keyboard at least) it
> doesnʼt involve any modifiers. But then again adding it would increase
> the chances of someone typing it by mistake.

As you noted, e= is already in latin-postfix. It seems odd to require E= in one 
mode and e= in another. It makes more sense for italian-postfix to be a subset 
of latin-postfix, so that an Italian user who needs foreign letters can switch 
without relearning composition pairs.