[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored
From: |
Michael Petch |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:31:22 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.17.0.090302 |
*chuckle*
I'm not anti-MS, nor am I a brown noser for RMS. I will admit when it comes
to IDE's hands down - MS has outdone the open source community (Eclipse is
no comparison). Most of the user I know - use windows. I have helped many
people set up build environments on windows. I personally use OS/X, Windows,
Linux and SCO at present.
I'm going to end on this note. I didn't make my post to become ideological
in nature, however choice of revision control often seems to come down to
that. I have used PVCS/CVS/BitKeeper/SVN and Git so to me personally, the
choice will not be a burden on me.
If this comes down to a vote, my previous post says it all.
Have a good weekend everyone.
On 05/06/09 7:22 PM, "Joseph Heled" <address@hidden> wrote:
> I am not an active developer anymore, but GNUbg was never about
> windows - far from it.
> If I knew a move to git would push some people away from windows I
> would certainly encourage the move even more.
>
> -Joseph
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, (continued)
Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, Russ Allbery, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, Christian Anthon, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, 保坂範行, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, Michael Petch, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, Michael Petch, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, Joseph Heled, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored,
Michael Petch <=
Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored, Jonathan Kinsey, 2009/06/10