Re: [Bug-gnubg] cvs restored

[Jonathan Kinsey]

Cool, I'll check it out later.

I think you've summed up git well and don't think it's the ideal fit for gnubg
at all at the moment. I suggest we leave things with cvs/savannah for now and
when we get post version 1 (hopefully sometime this year?) we can look at moving
to svn (especially if we want to restructure the directories).

Jon (in a post-vegas zombie state)

Christian Anthon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the cvs repository has been restored on savannah. It is from a May 27
> backup which matches what I have locally. Feel free to test it, and
> commit to it.
>
> As for moving to a different kind of VCS: I've looked a bit on git, and
> I don't think it is for us right now. Possibly git has some advantages
> over svn that I'm not aware of, but I believe subversion can do what we
> want (e.g. moving around files and keeping a sensible log), and more
> importantly the subversion clients are much better and more complete
> than the git ones.
>
> As for moving to an alternative to savannah: while the service that
> savannah provides isn't 100% in quality, I still feel that they have
> been reasonably reliable and sufficient for our needs, and I know of no
> other service that follows the GNU philosophy to the degree that
> savannah does.
>
> Christian.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

---

Beyond Hotmail - see what else you can do with Windows Live. Find out more.