[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?

From: Derek Price
Subject: Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 13:31:35 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

Paul Eggert wrote:

>Derek Price <address@hidden> writes:
>>Fair enough, but why undo the change to glob.m4?  Shouldn't I just
>>change the target of the AC_DEFINE from MISSING_SYS_CDEFS_H to _SYS_CDEFS_H?
>Yes, you're right.
>Sorry, I'd forgotten the trick that I had suggested.  (This suggests
>that it deserves a nice fat comment.  :-)

Done.  I added this comment to both glob_.h & glob.m4, with different
comment leaders, of course:

/* Note the reversal of the common HAVE_SYS_CDEFS_H idiom below.  In this
   way, #ifndef _SYS_CDEFS_H may be used to include <sys/cdefs.h> both when
   it has been checked for via the GNULIB configure test and found and when
   it has not been checked for, which we can presume means that the <glob.h>
   GNULIB shares with GLIBC is being included as a system header and not as
   part of GNULIB, in which case <sys/cdefs.h> may be assumed.  */

I'm going to commit what I have as the new glob module soon if noone
says otherwise.  I and the CVS team made a few more minor changes to
make it work on Solaris, BSD, and Windows, but it is now compiling and
running on some 7 diverse platforms.

After that I will write up a ChangeLog entry for the glob-glibc2gnulib
diff and submit our changes back to the glibc team, unless someone here
who is used to working with them would like to take a go at the actual
submission part.  Perhaps it would be smoother if someone already known
to the glibc team introduced me and this patch?  Is the "definitive"
version of shared files usually in glibc, gnulib, or wherever someone
last remembered to merge when this happens?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]