[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Oct 2006 19:46:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> Thanks for putting up with my critiques; I think the clean-temp module is
> better for it
Thanks for the critiques! I think the clean-temp module has improved more
in the three months since you and Paul got to look at it, than during
the previous three years where it was "hidden" in the gettext sources.
Bruno
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, (continued)
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, Eric Blake, 2006/10/05
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/06
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, Eric Blake, 2006/10/06
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/06
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, Eric Blake, 2006/10/06
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/06
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/06
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, Eric Blake, 2006/10/06
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/07
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, Eric Blake, 2006/10/07
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, Eric Blake, 2006/10/16
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/17
- Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/06
Re: clean-temp usage question, Eric Blake, 2006/10/06