bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [bug-gnulib] clean-temp usage question
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:39:52 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Bruno Haible on 10/7/2006 11:46 AM:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> Thanks for putting up with my critiques; I think the clean-temp module is
>> better for it
> 
> Thanks for the critiques! I think the clean-temp module has improved more
> in the three months since you and Paul got to look at it, than during
> the previous three years where it was "hidden" in the gettext sources.

One more.  Is it okay to apply this patch, to reduce make output clutter?

2006-10-16  Eric Blake  <address@hidden>

        * modules/clean-temp (Makefile.am): Don't add to make output...
        (configure.ac): ...instead define SIGNAL_SAFE_LIST inside
        config.h.

- --
Life is short - so eat dessert first!

Eric Blake             address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFNEJ384KuGfSFAYARArypAJ9zrCvDIpY3FYh2gL8BHRfHVLvyPQCeM1A7
7xjTiQGphHP5SpspOxfjxa4=
=570N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Index: modules/clean-temp
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/gnulib/gnulib/modules/clean-temp,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 clean-temp
--- modules/clean-temp  31 Jul 2006 11:39:18 -0000      1.2
+++ modules/clean-temp  17 Oct 2006 02:36:47 -0000
@@ -19,9 +19,9 @@ linkedhash-list
 gettext-h
 
 configure.ac:
+AC_DEFINE([SIGNAL_SAFE_LIST], [1], [Define if lists must be signal-safe.])
 
 Makefile.am:
-DEFS += -DSIGNAL_SAFE_LIST
 lib_SOURCES += clean-temp.h clean-temp.c
 
 Include:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]