Re: [RFC]: Adding Documentation to gnustep-base make

[Adam Fedor]

Jeff Teunissen wrote:
> Adam Fedor wrote:
>
> > OK, I'm getting schizophrenic now...
> >
> > I'm thinking of adding Documentation to the defualt make for
> > gnustep-base again.  If base is not already installed, it will fail
> > gracefully, but it will print a warning like:
> >
> > No libxml - processing of autogsdoc files skipped
> >
> > Will that be too confusing to people?
>
>
> Yes, in that the warning is inaccurate, which is a Very Bad Thing(tm). A
> bad warning is worse than blowing up, because it causes people to try to
> fix the wrong thing. People on IRC spent quite some time trying to fix a
> non-broken libxml.



I thought so. Here's another try: wrap the autogsdoc.make file with 
BASE_MAKE_LOADED, so that it instead prints out:

GNUstep-Base not installed - processing of autogsdoc files skipped


How about that?