Re: [RFC]: Adding Documentation to gnustep-base make

[Jeff Teunissen]

Adam Fedor wrote:

> Jeff Teunissen wrote:

[snip]

> > Yes, in that the warning is inaccurate, which is a Very Bad Thing(tm).
> > A bad warning is worse than blowing up, because it causes people to
> > try to fix the wrong thing. People on IRC spent quite some time trying
> > to fix a non-broken libxml.
> 
> I thought so. Here's another try: wrap the autogsdoc.make file with
> BASE_MAKE_LOADED, so that it instead prints out:
> 
> GNUstep-Base not installed - processing of autogsdoc files skipped
> 
> How about that?

"GNUstep Base Library not installed yet, skipping autogsdoc." \n
"If you would like to generate the documentation, do [something] after" \n
"it has been installed."

Or something like that. Like the ldconfig warning, describe the issue and
give a simple solution.

-- 
| Jeff Teunissen  -=-  Pres., Dusk To Dawn Computing  -=-  deek @ d2dc.net
| GPG: 1024D/9840105A   7102 808A 7733 C2F3 097B  161B 9222 DAB8 9840 105A
| Core developer, The QuakeForge Project        http://www.quakeforge.net/
| Specializing in Debian GNU/Linux              http://www.d2dc.net/~deek/