[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnumach and strpbrk

From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: gnumach and strpbrk
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:31:04 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.20i

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:40:02AM +0200, Niels M├Âller wrote:
> tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> > Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
> > 
> > > I suggest to add strpbrk to the allowed symbols to be taken from glibc, 
> > > and
> > > remove the strpbrk definition in the glue code.  Thinking about it, we
> > > should probably remove the strstr, strspn, strtok from the glue code as
> > > well, and just take them from glibc.
> > 
> > That is surely the right thing to do for all such functions.
> Except for strtok...

strtok_r comes to rescue if you need it!

Seriously, nobody will make GNU Mach SMP ready.  That's something for OSKit,
and we have to check that OSKit is allright and we don't use it or other
non-reentrant functions in OSKit-Mach directly in harmful places (we don't
use it at all right now, but it is listed in the "ok to steal" list of 


`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org brinkmd@debian.org
Marcus Brinkmann              GNU    http://www.gnu.org    marcus@gnu.org

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]