[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: No to StowFS!

From: Gianluca Guida
Subject: Re: No to StowFS!
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:29:03 +0100


On 2/5/06, Leonardo Pereira <leonardolopespereira@gmail.com> wrote:
> StowFS doesn't create links, it uses unionfs. The difference of both is
> almost simple, since with links you can remove stow and everything will keep
> working. With StowFS you need to have stowfs running to get things working
> (this "curiously" create a bootstrap problem

You can start being ironic on other people's work just _AFTER_ you get
some code running and proving you're right.


It was a type of people I did not know, I found them very strange and
they did not inspire confidence at all. Later I learned that I had been
introduced to electronic engineers.
                                                  E. W. Dijkstra

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]