bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH,HURD][RFC] hurdselect: Step7x, almost complete rewrite finish


From: Svante Signell
Subject: Re: [PATCH,HURD][RFC] hurdselect: Step7x, almost complete rewrite finished
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:12:57 +0100

On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 00:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 00:06:10 +0100, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 00:03 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Tue 12 Feb 2013 23:55:04 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 23:50 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > > Svante Signell, le Tue 12 Feb 2013 23:46:00 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > > > - some minor tweaks will still be made to be mor POSIX consistent.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It'd be way better to keep these as separate patches.  That's how 
> > > > > we'll
> > > > > have to submit them to libc-alpha anyway...
> > > > 
> > > > Is the description sufficient?
> > > 
> > > Yes.
> > > 
> > > > Do you want me to create intermediate versions (that will require an
> > > > effort and all of them have to be thoroughly tested)
> > > 
> > > For the EPIPE/EIO/EBADFS error handling (which is essentially most of
> > > the patch), no.  I'll rewrite that part completely, because your version
> > > has some issues 
> > 
> > which issues?
> 
> As I said, it would take too much time to go through it.

What a pity, I spent a very long time doing this rewrite, and to make
the code more readable (at least in my opinion). Back to spaghetti^Wold
style code then.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]