[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC]
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC] |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 07:09:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 06:42:13AM CET:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > On 6 Mar 2008, at 20:04, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> >>
> >> Because we generally use the same archive_cmds for F77, FC as for CXX,
> >> things can get a little messed up. This "fixes" the most common case,
> >> gcc, g++, g77/gfortran & some other fortran compiler, by pretending the
> >> "other fortran compiler" does not exist.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >
> > What happens to a project written with gnu C and vendor fortran? Will
> > this test spot g++ and refuse to build the fortran files?
>
> Depends on if those fortran compilers have their own rules or if they
> are inheriting.
> > Maybe we should look into tagging the archive_cmds instead.
>
> I did not see this mail til just now (after the commit). Want me to revert?
I find this patch very very ugly. It's a confession that after a
decade, we still can't get multi-lang right. I'm pretty sure that
it will cause regressions for some people, too.
Cheers,
Ralf
- [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 2008/03/05
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/07
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/03/07
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC],
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/07
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/07
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/07
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/07
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/07