[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15]
From: |
Wichert Akkerman |
Subject: |
Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15] |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 13:14:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Previously Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> That's a lot more informative for users than
>
> Error: your C++ compiler does not support dynamic type casts.
> Cannot compile LilyPond.
So you change that to:
Error: your C++ compiler does not support dynamic type casts,
Cannot compile LilyPond. Please upgrade your compiler (we
recommend XXXX)
That is actually a lot better, since it will also catch flaws in
compilers you are not familiar with.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/address@hidden This space intentionally left occupied \
| address@hidden http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
- Re: lily 1.4.15, (continued)
- Re: lily 1.4.15, Peter Chubb, 2002/07/02
- Re: lily 1.4.15, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Message not available
- Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Josip Rodin, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Josip Rodin, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Wichert Akkerman, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15],
Wichert Akkerman <=
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jochen Voss, 2002/07/02
Re: lily 1.4.15, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02