[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15]
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15] |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Jul 2002 12:53:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) |
Josip Rodin <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>> AAARG! How is anyone (being a humble configure script) supposed to
>> pick `3.1.1<SPACE>20020606' to be the version string from that?
>
> Why do you need the date, anyway? Just "3.1.1" should be enough
Yes, that's what I mean. We just need:
gcc --version
3.1.1
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- lily 1.4.15, Peter Chubb, 2002/07/01
- Re: lily 1.4.15, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: lily 1.4.15, Peter Chubb, 2002/07/02
- Re: lily 1.4.15, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Message not available
- Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Josip Rodin, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15],
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Josip Rodin, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Wichert Akkerman, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Wichert Akkerman, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jochen Voss, 2002/07/02
Re: lily 1.4.15, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02