Re: 2.13.40 regtests

[Neil Puttock]

On 21 November 2010 23:16, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:

> Huh.  So evidently there's some other reason behind the fix for
> this break not being detected?  It might be related to the
> imagemagick's syntax change:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=908

I don't think this is the problem.

The check relies on a grob existing in the baseline image for
comparison with the check image; in this case, there's no BassFigure
in the original image, and its appearance in the changed image has no
effect on other bounding boxes, so there's no distance change.

Cheers,
Neil