bug-parted
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

confusing message patch


From: Chris Lumens
Subject: confusing message patch
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:01:31 -0400 (EDT)

I've got a bug report where the reporter has a disk with a sector size
other than 512 bytes and believes the message displayed is confusing.
In particular, the "Ignore" option does ignore the message by continuing
with the detected sector size, while "Cancel" doesn't quit at all but
instead continues with PARTED_SECTOR_SIZE.  I tend to agree with him
that this is pretty confusing.

My fix is something I'm not really happy with, but it's the best thing
I've been able to come up with.  I first have an exception saying that
parted may not work with the detected size and prompt for continue/quit.
If they continue, I have a second exception for which sector size they
would like to use.

Unfortunately, I can't test this since I have no disks with weird sector
sizes.  It compiles, though.  If this looks like a good fix to everyone
on this list, I can talk to the bug reporter to see about him testing
it.

The bug report is:

        https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158218

And the patch is below.

- Chris


Index: linux.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/parted/stable/libparted/linux.c,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -r1.18 linux.c
--- linux.c     4 Jun 2005 11:14:00 -0000       1.18
+++ linux.c     14 Jul 2005 17:55:56 -0000
@@ -354,8 +354,9 @@
 static int
 _device_get_sector_size (PedDevice* dev)
 {
-       LinuxSpecific*  arch_specific = LINUX_SPECIFIC (dev);
-       int             sector_size;
+       PedExceptionOption      ex_status;
+       LinuxSpecific*          arch_specific = LINUX_SPECIFIC (dev);
+       int                     sector_size;

        PED_ASSERT (dev->open_count, return 0);

@@ -364,17 +365,34 @@
        if (ioctl (arch_specific->fd, BLKSSZGET, &sector_size))
                return PED_SECTOR_SIZE;

+       /* First ask if they even want to continue with this operation at all.
+        * If so, ask if they want to use the device's sector size or parted's
+        * default safe size.
+        */
        if (sector_size != PED_SECTOR_SIZE) {
+               ex_status = ped_exception_throw (
+                               PED_EXCEPTION_BUG,
+                               PED_EXCEPTION_YES_NO,
+                               _("The sector size on %s is %d bytes.  Parted "
+                               "is known not to work properly with drives "
+                               "with sector sizes other than %d bytes.  "
+                               "Continue?"),
+                               dev->path, sector_size, PED_SECTOR_SIZE);
+
+               switch (ex_status) {
+                       case PED_EXCEPTION_UNHANDLED:
+                               ped_exception_catch();
+                       case PED_EXCEPTION_NO:
+                               return 0;
+               }
+
                if (ped_exception_throw (
                        PED_EXCEPTION_BUG,
-                       PED_EXCEPTION_IGNORE_CANCEL,
-                       _("The sector size on %s is %d bytes.  Parted is known "
-                       "not to work properly with drives with sector sizes "
-                       "other than %d bytes."),
+                       PED_EXCEPTION_YES_NO,
+                       _("Use the sector size on %s of %d bytes?"),
                        dev->path,
-                       sector_size,
-                       PED_SECTOR_SIZE)
-                               == PED_EXCEPTION_IGNORE)
+                       sector_size)
+                               == PED_EXCEPTION_YES)
                        return sector_size;
                else
                        return PED_SECTOR_SIZE;




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]