[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: parted NAME <part> <name> Vs mkdosfs -n <name>

From: John Galloway
Subject: Re: parted NAME <part> <name> Vs mkdosfs -n <name>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:27:49 -0700

I should have included the version I was using for this, which is 1.7.1
built and tested under Ubuntu 5.10 .
On Jun 6, 2006, at 2:39 PM, John Galloway wrote:

I can not get parted to put a name on a dos partition such that
it is seen by HAL.  Using mkdosfs -n <name> ... this works fine,
but I can not get the same thing to occur with parted.  What's
going on?   Using parted would be nice since I get partition table
creation and mkfs all in one, but being able to specifiy the name
is essential.

bug-parted mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]