Re: parted NAME <part> <name> Vs mkdosfs -n <name>

[John Galloway]

I should have included the version I was using for this, which is 1.7.1
built and tested under Ubuntu 5.10 .
 -jrg
On Jun 6, 2006, at 2:39 PM, John Galloway wrote:

> I can not get parted to put a name on a dos partition such that
> it is seen by HAL.  Using mkdosfs -n <name> ... this works fine,
> but I can not get the same thing to occur with parted.  What's
> going on?   Using parted would be nice since I get partition table
> creation and mkfs all in one, but being able to specifiy the name
> is essential.
>   -jrg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-parted mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted