[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: parted NAME <part> <name> Vs mkdosfs -n <name>

From: leslie . polzer
Subject: Re: parted NAME <part> <name> Vs mkdosfs -n <name>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 18:32:49 +0200
User-agent: mutt-ng/devel-r802 (Linux)

Hello John,

  I'm having trouble understanding you... some questions:

On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 05:00:12PM -0700, John Galloway wrote:

> Answering my own question: NAME isn't supported for msdos partitions
What do you mean by "NAME"?

> the bug here is two fold.
Do you mean within Parted?

> 1) that it doesn't complain but silently does nothing,
What is "it" and when does it complain?

> 2) that it isn't supported for msdos partitions.
IIRC Parted does not support naming file systems at all, only
partitions, where supported by partition table.


gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289

Attachment: pgpzOvnGwTArZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]