[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:45:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 09:52:27PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> That place where validation is done _is_ the problem if you don't use
> the switch: tag table entries, xrefs, and node names are @-expanded at
> different points in the code control flow, so if some of them use
> @-commands while others don't, you get validation failures and other
> problems. We don't want to lose validation, do we?
Indeed. But the documentation says 'Allow `@'-commands in node names.'
They are allowed whether it is set or not. Not a big deal anyway.
I also think that it should be the default.
--
Pat
- @value, macro and other expansion questions, Patrice Dumas, 2008/08/20
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions, Karl Berry, 2008/08/22
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions, Patrice Dumas, 2008/08/25
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/25
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions,
Patrice Dumas <=
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/27
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions, Patrice Dumas, 2008/08/28
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions, Karl Berry, 2008/08/25
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions, Patrice Dumas, 2008/08/27
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions, Patrice Dumas, 2008/08/27
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions, Karl Berry, 2008/08/27
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions, Patrice Dumas, 2008/08/28
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions, Karl Berry, 2008/08/30
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions, Patrice Dumas, 2008/08/28
- Re: @value, macro and other expansion questions, Karl Berry, 2008/08/28